Breaking: U.S. Dept. Of Defense Data Shatters Official COVID Narrative!

Published on 

Written by

AI-powered DoD data analysis program named “Project Salus” shatters official vaccine narrative, shows A.D.E. accelerating in the fully vaccinated with each passing week.

The alarming findings show that the vast majority of covid hospitalizations are occurring among fully-vaccinated individuals and that outcomes among the fully vaccinated are growing worse with each passing week. This appears to fit the pattern of so-called Antibody Dependent Enhancement, where the treatment intervention (mRNA vaccines) is worsening health outcomes and leading to excess hospitalizations and deaths.

These data, presented here, shatter the official Biden / Fauci narrative that falsely claims America is experiencing, “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” The data show that the pandemic actually appears to be accelerated by covid-19 vaccines, while unvaccinated individuals are having far better outcomes than the vaccinated.

Furthermore, according to these data (shown below), the single best strategy for avoid post-vaccine infections and hospitalizations is natural immunity derived from a previous covid infection.

The full analysis is entitled, “Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against the Delta variant among 5.6M Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older” and is dated Sep. 28, 2021. The presentation of these data consists of 17 slides, which are available at the Humetric website in slide form, also posted on Natural News servers in this PDF versionwhich is more convenient for viewing and printing.

From the JAIC Project Salus document:

In this 80 percent vaccinated 65+ population, an estimated 60 percent of COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in fully vaccinated individuals in the week ending August 7th.

By August 21st, 71 percent of covid-19 “cases” were occurring among fully vaccinated individuals:

In this 80 percent vaccinated 65+ population, an estimated 71 percent of COVID-19 cases occurred in fully vaccinated individuals.

These data reveal that as the Delta variant approached a 97% infection rate, “cases” and hospitalizations among fully vaccinated individuals showed striking increases with each passing week.

Key Findings Of The DoD / JAIC / Project Salus / Humetrix Analysis

Throughout the slides, “VE” refers to vaccine effectiveness. “Breakthrough” means a failed vaccine, where a fully vaccinated person is diagnosed with covid. Many of those people require hospitalization and ICU treatments (see the slides below).

Some of the key findings of the Project Salus analysis include:

  • The effectiveness of mRNA vaccines is confirmed to wane over time.
  • With each passing week, those vaccinated with mRNA vaccines show an increasedrisk of vaccine failure / covid infections requiring hospitalization. From the analysis: “Odds ratio increasing to 2.5 at 6 months post vaccination.”
  • Natural immunity works: A prior covid infection greatly reduces the odds of a vaccinated person needing hospitalization from a subsequent infection.

Vaccine Failure Dramatically Worsens Within 5-6 Months After Being Vaccinated

One slide from the analysis reveals that so-called “breakthrough” infections — vaccine failures — increase with time, showing a near doubling of breakthrough infections among those vaccinated 5-6 months ago vs. those vaccinated only 3-4 months ago.

These data end at August 21st, 2021 but the trend does not appear to be flattening. As more data are added to this analysis each week, it seems almost certain that breakthrough infections rates will continue to rise over time in vaccinated individuals. We do not yet know what will happen in 9 months after vaccination, but these data show cause for serious concern.

The following chart reveals that both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are showing the same pattern of worsening “breakthrough” infection rates over time. Notice the upward trend of all the bars in this chart, meaning both mRNA vaccines are producing the same increase in infections among the fully vaccinated:

Once The Delta Variant Took Hold, 71 Percent Of COVID-19 “Breakthrough” Cases Occurred Among The Fully Vaccinated

As the following chart shows, 71 percent of COVID-19 “cases” were breakthrough cases (vaccine failures) once the Delta variant reached 90 percent spread across those infected.

Understand that the authors of this document state that those who are jabbed are not considered “vaccinated” until two weeks after they received the injections, which means that infections, hospitalizations and deaths which occurred from 0 – 14 days are ignored in this data set.

In reality, that means the percentage of “fully vaccinated” people responsible for breakthrough infections, hospitalizations and deaths is substantially higher than what is shown in these data. If they are claiming a 71 percent rate, it may in reality be more like 80 percent or even 90 percent, but we don’t know for sure because they are hiding all negative health outcomes for the first two weeks after the vaccines are administered (by claiming those people are “unvaccinated,” which is a deliberate deception being used to try to hide the harmful effects of vaccines).

Ethnic Groups Hit Hardest: Native Americans, Hispanics And Blacks

Finally, a horrifying slide in the data set reveals that one of the highest risk factors for being hospitalized after being vaccinated is simply being of Native American descent. According to the data in this slide, Native Americans face around 50 percent higher odds of being hospitalized after being vaccinated, compared to other ethnic groups such as Whites.

Hispanics face a slightly lower risk which appears to be around 40 percent higher odds. Blacks face around 25 percent higher odds.

Why is this the case? The gain-of-function properties which were engineered into the SARS-CoV-2 biological weapon — via Fauci, Daszak and the NIH — target ACE2 receptors which exist in higher densities in targeted organ systems of many minority groups such as Native Americans, Hispanics and Blacks.

This has led many observers to conclude that the covid spike protein — which is generated in the bodies of those who take mRNA vaccines — is a race-specific bioweapon designed to achieve depopulation of minority groups.

Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, has engaged in many efforts to bring this to the attention of his followers, for example. These data provided by the DoD / JAIC / Project Salus document shown here appear to support the plausibility of such theories.

Other factors that greatly increase a person’s odds of being hospitalized after receiving vaccinations include kidney failure (ESRD), morbid obesity, chronic liver disease or receiving chemotherapy.

Natural immunity offers documented protect against future hospitalization

Finally, the data presented in this document shows that natural immunity — listed as “prior covid-19” substantially decreases the risk of hospitalization after receiving covid-19 vaccines. (See slide above.)

What this means is that the best way to ensure the safest outcome of a covid vaccine is to experience a covid infection before getting vaccinated. This dramatically reduces your risk of negative health outcomes.

Then again, if someone has already had covid, why would they need a vaccine in the first place? If anything, these data show that anyone choosing to receive covid-19 vaccines is making the wrong choice if they desire to avoid infections, hospitalizations or deaths.

Natural immunity, once again, is revealed as the most effective status that reduces negative outcomes.


In conclusion, these data from the DoD / JAIC absolutely shatter the false narrative of Biden, Fauci, Walensky and other “authorities” who are still attempting to gaslight the American people into thinking that hospitals are filled with unvaccinated people. In reality, the vast majority of hospitalizations and deaths are occurring among those who were fully vaccinated, according to the 5.6 million people studied in this particular data set (Medicare).

Importantly, post-vaccine health outcomes are worsening over time, meaning that the vaccines appear to be gradually damaging the immune system over subsequent months, making vaccinated individuals far more vulnerable to subsequent infections.

This is the very definition of ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement), about which many analysts such as Dr. Sherri Tenpenny have warned. Now, it appears that ADE is no longer merely a theory but rather a confirmed phenomenon reflected in official Medicare data.

Attorney Thomas Renz told Natural News today that these data should immediately result in not just the FDA’s revocation of mRNA vaccine EUA and approval status, but that the FDA, Fauci and Big Pharma’s top executives should be sued under RICO Act violations for racketeering and organized crime.

See more here:

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 


Share This:

Trackback from your site.

Comments (7)

  • Avatar


     | #

    If 60% of hospitalisations are in the 80% vaccinated group then 40% are in the 20% not vaccinated group, so there is a higher rate of hospitalisation in the unvaccinated group. PSI continues to promote articles with basic errors in the assessment. The key issue to be examined must be the reasons for hospitalisations. The unvaccinated group are there because they are suffering from Covid. The vaccinated group might be hospitalised because of problems related to the vaccine. We also have no idea about existing conditions of either group.

    Where is the evidence to support the claim that a prior infection reduces risk of hospitalisation with a second infection?


    • Avatar

      Herb Rose

       | #

      Hi ASlan,
      Statistics is not my thing because it seems that the selection of criteria is done to get the desired outcome. However, if they will count anyone who has had the vaccine for less than 2 weeks as unvaccinated it seems to me that when measuring the vaccinated hospitalized they should be a consideration of how long ago they were vaccinated. If the immunity from the vaccination lasts for 6 months then the current hospitalization rate should be compared to the vaccinated percentage 6 months ago, not the current vaccination percentage.


    • Avatar

      Very Old White Guy

       | #

      You seem to have difficulty reading Alan.


  • Avatar

    Denis Dombas

     | #

    it looks to me that Alan is either uninformed yet about the “agenda” or simply troll!


  • Avatar

    John V

     | #

    Alan says “ so there is a higher rate of hospitalisation in the unvaccinated group.”
    Take 1000 people.
    80% “vaccinated” (actually got the jab, whatever it is, basically, the people that volunteered to be part of the clinical trial)
    Equals 800 people had the jab
    60% hospitalizations of that group = 480 people
    20% in the control group (did not get the jab)
    Equals 200 people
    40% hospitalizations of that group = 80 people
    So, jabbed people have accounted for 6x the amount of hospitalizations compared to the non-jabbed.

    Math is not your strong point.


    • Avatar

      Herb Rose

       | #

      Hi John,
      Math is not my strong point but I think you have it wrong.
      It is not that 60% of the vaccinated or 40% of the unvaccinated are being hospitalized. That would be millions of patients. Of the hospitalized patients 60% are vaccinated and 40% are unvaccinated. If both groups were getting ill at the same rate you’d expect 80% of them to be vaccinated and 20% to be unvaccinated.
      The problem is that the unvaccinated have always been unvaccinated while the vaccinated group includes people who got the shot 2 weeks ago and people who got the shot a year ago, so the percentage of vaccinated has continuously grown but the length of exposure for the two groups is not the same.The proper way to do the test is to have two groups given either a placebo or a vaccine at the same time.Then as time passes you can compare how many in the two groups get the disease. This was how theist was supposed to be run, but the pharmaceutical companies destroyed the test when after a short time before ADE and other effects occurred when they vaccinated the placebo group. I expect as time passes and the rate of vaccinations decreases we will see the hospitalization being almost exclusively the vaccinated. The vaccination will give short lived protection while the unvaccinated who get the disease will have longterm protection.