The Nuclear Football

House Democrats Want Biden to Give Up Sole Authority to Launch Nuclear Weapons

President Joe Biden signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on Jan. 20, 2021. (Tom Brenner/Reuters)

Several-dozen House Democrats signed a letter asking President Joe Biden to give up his sole authority to launch nuclear weapons and “consider modifying” the command and control of the U.S. nuclear forces.

“Vesting one person with this authority entails real risks,” a letter from Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif.) said. “Past presidents have threatened to attack other countries with nuclear weapons or exhibited behavior that caused other officials to express concern about the president’s judgment.”

The letter stipulates: “While any president would presumably consult with advisors before ordering a nuclear attack, there is no requirement to do so. The military is obligated to carry out the order if they assess it is legal under the laws of war. Under the current posture of U.S. nuclear forces, that attack would happen in minutes.”

Panetta on Monday made a similar statement, saying on Twitter that he is calling on the White House “to install checks & balances in our nuclear command-and-control structure.”

“Past presidents have threatened nuclear attacks on other countries or exhibited concerning behavior that cast doubt on their judgment,” according to his tweet.

The letter was signed by Panetta and Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.). Politico reported that about three-dozen Democrats also signed the letter.

According to the letter, the lawmakers proposed to require more officials, including the vice president and House speaker, to “concur with a launch order.”

They also posited “requiring certifications from the secretary of defense that the launch order is valid and from the attorney general that it is legal,” and it would require a congressional declaration of war or another specific authorization effort from Congress.

The Epoch Times has reached out to Panetta’s office and the White House for comment.

In January, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) claimed she spoke with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley about protecting the nuclear codes from former President Donald Trump.

Pelosi said she spoke to Milley on Jan. 5 “to discuss available precautions for preventing an unstable president from initiating military hostilities or accessing the launch codes and ordering a nuclear strike.”

However, despite her claim, the power has remained with the White House since former President Harry Truman ordered two atomic bombs be dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Typically, a military aide shadows the president and has a black briefcase known as the “nuclear football.” A president is legally able to order a nuclear attack with the U.S.’s arsenal of weapons, including intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched missiles, or via strategic bombers.

Conservative Groups Launch Movement to Protect Children From Gender Identity Politics

The Deployment of the National Guard

CENTER for AMERICAN DEFENSE STUDIES (CADS)
America First – Not Alone

HOMELAND DEFENSE – ANALYSIS: Militarized Inauguration and the National Guard –
Questions and Concerns ©

With the ongoing questions about the January 6 Capitol Riot, the subsequent militarized response to the
59th Presidential Inauguration, a new focus on domestic enemies,’ and calls to root out extremism in the
U.S. military, CADS is creating a new focus area called ‘Homeland Defense.’ With the addition of Major
General Donald McGregor, USAF Ret., to the CADS Board of Advisors, we can now bring a unique
perspective on issues related to the National Guard, civil response, and homeland defense. This thought
piece by General McGregor raises important questions about the Inauguration security, National Guard,
and serious cascading concerns.” Paul Crespo, President. Militarized Inauguration and the National Guard – Questions and Concerns

By Donald McGregor, Major General, USAF, Ret.

February 17, 2021

January 6, 2021, is “a date which will live in infamy.” But not for the reasons given in the
mainstream media and by Congress. That day’s tragic events are far-reaching and go well
beyond the event itself. The malevolent behavior of a few laid the foundation for a
disproportionate military response in support of the 59th Presidential Inaugural. Worse, it led
to the unwarranted and ill-defined “screening” of our National Guard. And now a confusing
ideological purge of military members accused of possible ‘extremism.’
Background

After the January 6 riot at the Capitol, the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF), in coordination with the
National Guard Bureau (NGB), requested additional National Guard (NG) forces to support the
presidential inaugural. It remains unknown how the request unfolded and whether it was solely the
Pentagon’s doing or went through more appropriate channels such as a civilian federal agency, the
District of Columbia Mayor, local law enforcement—or did it come directly from the President?
On the day of the inauguration, the NG deployed more than 25,000 troops to the District of Columbia
(DC) and an estimated 6% of each State’s NG to assist law enforcement for potential civil unrest
nationwide. This puts the number of guardsmen requested by the Department of Defense (DoD) in the
tens of thousands—an unprecedented demand that should raise justified concerns.
Critical Question – Was it legal?

What drove the DoD to insist on this excessive level of domestic military activity? Were legitimate
threats identified by the United States Secret Service (USSS), the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), or the FBI to justify this extraordinary military response?

Were the proper authorities used to request the National Guard or direct the DoD to activate the NG?

Further, was it legal for the NG to provide direct support to civil law enforcement—a controversial
mission for the military? Were the proper authorities used to request the National Guard or direct the
DoD to activate the NG? And more importantly, what were the arguments, discriminators and rationales
behind the unusual “screening” and subsequent removal of service members from the National Guard
inaugural detail and civil disturbance operations?

The devil is in the details and it appears congressional concerns and a lack of confidence in our National
Guard may have been the driving force behind excessive activations of the NG and inappropriate and
gratuitous screenings.

A more central question is whether the deployment was legally authorized to begin with. One state’s
National Guard Adjutant General (AG) questioned the legality of the request for Guard support to civil
disturbance operations in DC and possible lack of presidential authorization. The Adjutant General for
Arizona denied National Guard support due to legal concerns, noting in a letter that it appeared the
President’s involvement with this request was in question, which is legally problematic.
The AG stated in his letter:

My legal team raised the above concerns, regarding the Posse Comitatus Act and related DoD
regulatory prohibitions on the use of the Title 32 USC 502(f)(2)(A) status to perform direct
support to law enforcement and civil disturbance operations in the District of Columbia.”
Further, the AG questioned, “The press release [11 January 2021 White House press release]
does not mention Presidential approval for the use of DoD resources in support of civilian law
enforcement and civil disturbance operations.
According to executive order 11485, The President is “Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the
United States and the National Guard of the District of Columbia…”

More Questions

For example – What drove the DoD to insist on this excessive level of domestic military activity? Were
legitimate threats identified by the United States Secret Service (USSS), the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), or the FBI to justify this extraordinary military response? And if there was a legitimate
justification where is the official assessment and who wrote it? The DoD (and National Guard),
conducted by the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy and supported by the NGB, have a deliberate
process for reviewing the rationale, in this case a threat assessment, for NG Title 32 USC activations.
Where is this DoD review and what were the results?

While it is not unusual for the National Guard to be activated in support of a National Special Security
Event (NSSE) such as the inaugural, usually fewer than 10,000 NG troops are deployed and they rarely
engage directly in law enforcement activities. NSSE is a term used by the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) to identify specific events that have a “higher chance of being targeted by terrorism or
other criminal activities that may pose a threat to protectees and the mass crowds that often surround
these events.”

By comparison, the 56th Presidential Inaugural for Barack H. Obama had just over 10,000 National Guard
members in support, which was then considered an extraordinary number.
Normally, in these NSSE events, the National Guard has a support role, providing capabilities such as
communications, explosive ordnance disposal, transport, traffic control, medical, and logistical support,
as well as playing music and marching in the inaugural parade. The NG usually stays in the background
assisting law enforcement, not the other way around. It does not directly engage in law enforcement
activities, specifically under the dubious legal status they were activated under.
Beyond that, arming the NG for such an event is rare, requiring strict rules of engagement (ROE) and
well-defined mission roles. Numerous observers also noted that many of the NG members in DC did not
have magazines in their pistols or rifles, which in itself implies they were intended more as ‘security’
theater, then as a civil disturbance force.

Was the NSSE Security Planning Process Ignored or Politicized?
NSSE Security planning always begins with one thing – A threat assessment. This is fundamental to the
planning process as it drives the security resources and commensurate response to secure the event.
Put simply, what is the threat, how bad is it, and what do we do about it? DHS did release a “first of its
kind” Homeland Threat Assessment October 6, 2020, before the election—an important document that
can be used to build a baseline threat appraisal.
But the specifics of the event such as location, logistics, geographics, lines of communication, and local
jurisdictions require a separate and more detailed review, not to mention a serious update after the
January 6 riot. Since this threat assessment is supposed to drive the allocation of every security
resource, threat level, and the need for additional background checks, was one completed?

From the publicly available reports, it appears that only a limited overall threat assessment was
performed beyond the above noted October 2020 DHS Assessment. And it is very possible that it was
not updated to incorporate the events of January 6.
Real Threats or Politics?

Based on indicators such as a lack of logistical resources to support the increase in numbers, possible
misuse, and violation of policies and/or statutory military activation laws, improperly assigned missions
and roles, hasty and unwarranted additional screening, and questionable outside pressure make it
appear that the level of NG response had little to do with the actual threats and more to do with
politics.

One major indicator of unsound planning is the still rising cost for the short-term NG deployments to
Washington. Someplace the estimate at $300 million. Others put the price tag closer to $500 million – or
half a billion dollars. By comparison, the entire Capitol Police annual budget is only $464 million.
Unfortunately, all this implies that the military resources originally requested were most likely increased
based on hasty reactions and an unknown or ill-described security threat. In fact, the addition of NG
participation may have been driven by congressional pressure with little understanding of the menace
our guardsmen were supposed to defend against.

Alternative Inauguration Scenarios?

At this point, a prudent planner would ask if the heightened security concerns and enormous cost
should have prompted plans for alternative inauguration scenarios. If the militarized reaction was due to
what Congress and others somehow intuitively felt was a serious risk from armies of deranged
anarchists and extremists — then why not, simply have a different kind of inauguration?
Add to the mix the fear of COVID-19 and it seems that canceling or holding a totally virtual event would
have been a reasonable alternative; preferable, far more prudent, and far less costly. Yet, the
inauguration proceeded as planned. And considering the politics of a contested election and the
unnerving siege of the Capitol, the massive security deployment – which essentially created a militarily
‘occupied’ downtown DC – ended up being more a stage show of political and security theater, than a
reasonable response to any plausible threat.

And the Guard appeared to get caught in the middle of this politicized reaction.
What was the Credible Threat?

The violence at the Capitol on January 6 by which still appears to have been by an unarmed mob, was
appalling and unacceptable. Some involved may have had more nefarious intent than others. And they
are rightly being identified, arrested, and prosecuted. But for many of the rioters, the breach of the
Capitol was more symbolic than revolutionary, using the event to roam the halls of Congress taking self-promoting selfies.
Based on the information provided thus far, five persons died during or shortly after the events of
January 6. However, of those five, three rally attendees unrelated to the rioters reportedly died from
preexisting medical conditions, not from any violence. The cause of death for the one Capitol Police
An officer who died shortly afterward – Brian Sicknick – is still unknown, but news reports state he did not
suffer from any blunt force trauma injuries during his clash with rioters.
In fact, only one death can be directly attributed to violence at the Capitol – the shooting death of
unarmed rioter Ashli Babbitt – killed by Capitol Police within feet of the room housing Congressional
members.

Many contrasted the actual violence and property destruction during the months of burning and looting
and direct attacks on federal buildings and police in DC and cities across the nation during months of
violent Antifa and BLM riots. These riots, according to reports by the Insurance Information Institute,
caused as much as $2 billion in property damage (making them the worst in U.S. history), and the
harming and even maiming of over 2,000 police officers – some permanently blinded by lasers used by
the rioters. This, according to the Major Cities Chiefs Association Intelligence Commanders Group
October 2020 report.
Critics argue that the actual damage and harm at the Capitol pales in comparison to last summer’s riots,
which makes the militarized reaction to the January 6 riot highly suspect.

Screenings – Did DoD Violate Its Policies and the Law?
Adding to the earlier serious questions, one of the most critical is – Did the Pentagon break the law and
its own policies to order the massive deployment of military force to the capital? It is imperative that
this question is properly addressed and answered.
DoD activated the National Guard under Title 32 502 (f)(2)(A) in direct support of law enforcement,
which violates 10 U.S. Code section 275 (restrictions of direct military participation with law
enforcement), 18 U.S. Code section 1385 (posse comitatus), and the DoD’s overarching civil support
directive DoDD 3025.18 (Defense Support of Civil Authorities).
Further, other possible offenses include the unconstitutional “additional screening” of National Guard
participants, which infringed their right to free speech and due process, as well as potentially violating
social media privacy laws and retaliation for political activities in the workplace.
The DoD requested the National Guard Bureau to solicit the Adjutant Generals of the states and
territories to “screen” participating guardsmen using unspecified ‘discriminates’ and then to remove
those identified for ill-defined defamatory and/or extremist social media content. The Director of the
Army National Guard then allegedly sent an email to all 54 adjutants-general requesting that they screen
National Guard members participating in the District of Columbia operations, and identify anyone they
have concerns with after reviewing their social media posts.
As noted earlier, the Arizona Adjutant General denied the request for Guard support. In his letter to the
NGB denying the request the AG further questioned the apparently baseless screening methods, stating
that:

“I do not believe the above-described social media screening is appropriate.”
Even regarding existing DoD policies for social media screening, DoD’s Insider Threat Program, only calls
for reporting (not screening), spoofing or questioning foreign radicals for “suspicious cyber incidents” …
“through social networking sites.” The difference here is between an incidental versus a purposeful
review of a military member’s social media.

In other words, what was the legal justification for searching or acting on this information to expel a
member of the military from a security detail? And who was the primary source for this information –
DoD, local commanders, or another federal agency? It is estimated that as many as twelve serving
members of the National Guard were removed from inaugural security for unspecified reasons – and
this number could be getting larger?

The additional screening of our National Guard made it clear that some political decision-makers did not
trust the Americans they were requesting to protect them. The problem is who decides when our own
soldiers cannot be trusted? Is it Congress? Another federal agency? And what are the discriminates—
being active members in ‘alt-right groups or white supremacist organizations, or simply being a
traditional conservative?

As many continue to point out, when many of America’s cities burned and anarchy seemed to reign last
summer during anti-police and racial riots, those radical left-wing extremists were not subject to similar
scrutiny.

CONCLUSION
The highly questionable militarization of the inaugural, and the controversial screening of National
Guard members – as well as the Capitol riot – are unprecedented events in U.S. history. They should all
concern all Americans. However, the entire U.S. National Guard is now being treated with the same
suspicions as those few who stormed the Capitol. Is the National Guard, or our active-duty military, less
trustworthy than the Capitol Police, or the Washington, DC Metropolitan Police Department?
Is the question now that the men and women who place themselves in harm’s way to safeguard our
institutions and country cannot themselves be trusted? If so, the real question is – how soon before
every citizen falls under suspicion.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
BIOGRAPHIES
Donald McGregor, Major General, U.S. Air Force, Retired, is an accomplished national security leader,
fighter pilot and career Air Force Officer with a diverse career, and expertise in Homeland Defense and
National Guard issues. He was a former lead advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, who is a
member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. In this lead advisor role, he was the National Guard’s Director of
Strategy, Policy, Plans, and International Affairs, developing overall strategy, Secretary of Defense
(SECDEF) policy, and civil support planning for the National Guard’s warfighting, homeland, and
international partnership missions.

A leading military-civil response expert, General McGregor was Deputy Director of Operations for United
States Northern Command (NORTHCOM), overseeing daily operations of NORTHCOM’s homeland
defense and civil response. Earlier, he commanded a Minnesota Air National Guard squadron during
9/11, standing up three geographically displaced alert operations in support of Operation Northern
Watch. General McGregor has a Master of Arts in Diplomacy and International Conflict Resolution from
Norwich University, and a Bachelor of Arts in Computer Science from the University of Minnesota.

Collective Madness

Our Descent Into Collective Madness?

These are crazy times. A pandemic led to national quarantine, to the self-induced recession, to riot, arson, and looting, to a contested election, and to a riot at the Capitol.

In response, are we focusing solely on upping the daily vaccination rate?

Getting the country back to work? Opening the schools as the virus attenuates? Ensuring safety in the streets?

Or are we descending into a sort of madness?

It might have been understandable that trillions of dollars had to be borrowed to keep a suffocating economy breathing.

But it makes little sense to keep borrowing $2 trillion a year to prime an economy now set to roar back with herd-like immunity on the horizon.

Trillions of dollars in stimulus are already priming the economy.

Cabin-feverish Americans are poised to get out of their homes to travel, eat out, and socialize as never before.

Meanwhile, the United States will have to start paying down $30 trillion in debt. But we seem more fixated on raising rather than reducing that astronomical obligation.

We are told man-made, worldwide climate change—as in the now discarded term “global warming”—can best be addressed by massive dislocations in the U.S. economy.

The Biden Administration plans to shut down coal plants. It will halt even nearly completed new gas and oil pipelines. It cuts back on fracking to embrace the multitrillion-dollar “Green New Deal.”

Americans should pause and examine the utter disaster that unfolded recently in Texas and its environs.

Parts of the American southwest were covered in ice and snow for days. Nighttime temperatures crashed to near zero in some places.

The state, under pressure, had been transitioning from its near limitless and cheap reservoirs of natural gas and other fossil fuels to generating power through wind and solar.

But what happens to millions of Texans when wind turbines freeze up while storm clouds extinguish solar power?

We are witnessing the answer in oil-and-gas rich, but energy-poor Texas that is all but shut down.

Millions are shivering without electricity and affordable heating. Some may die or become ill by this self-induced disaster—one fueled by man-made ideological rigidity.

Texas’ use of natural gas in power generation has helped the United States to curb carbon emissions. Ignoring it for unreliable wind and solar alternatives was bound to have catastrophic consequences whenever a politically incorrect nature did not follow the global warming script.

In 2019, a special counsel wrapped up a 22-month, $35 million investigations into President Trump’s alleged “collusion” with Russia in the 2016 election. Robert Mueller and his team searched long and hard for a crime and came up empty.

Then Trump in December 2019 was impeached and acquitted in the Senate in early 2020. His purported crime was warning the Ukrainians about the Biden family’s quid pro quo racketeering.

After the revelations concerning Hunter Biden’s shenanigans not only in Ukraine but also in Kazakhstan and China, Trump’s admonitions now seem prescient rather than impeachable.

Trump had been threatened with removal from office under the 25th Amendment. He was accused variously of violating the Logan Act and the Constitution’s emoluments clause. His executive orders were often declared unconstitutional if not seditionary.

All these oppositional measures predictably failed to receive either public or even congressional support.

Finally, an exasperated Left decided to flog the presidential corpse of a now private citizen Trump.

It did so without a constitutionally mandated chief justice to oversee an impeachment trial in the Senate.  The targeted president was no longer president.

There was no special prosecutor, little debate, and even less cross-examination. In the end, the second impeachment was sillier than the first. But, like the first, the show trial also wasted precious time and resources in the midst of a pandemic.

But the height of our collective madness is the current cancel culture. Its subtexts are “unearned white privilege” and “white supremacy.”

In the name of those supposed abominations, mobs tear down statues, destroy careers, censor speech, require veritable oaths, and conduct reeducation training.

Stranger still, those alleging “white privilege” are usually themselves quite wealthy, liberal—and white. These elites count on their incestuous networking, silver-spoon upbringings, and their tony degrees to leverage status, influence and money—in a way undreamed of by the white working class.

Quite affluent and privileged minorities likewise join the chorus to call for everything from reparations to “reprogramming” Trump voters.

The most elite in America are the most likely to damn the privilege of those who lack it. Perhaps this illogic squares the psychological circle of feeling guilty about what they never have any intention of giving up.

If blaming those without advantages does not satisfy the unhappy liberal elite, then there is always warring against the mute dead: changing their eponymous names, destroying their statues, slandering their memories, and denying their achievements.

The common denominator with all these absurdities? An ungracious and neurotic elite whose judgment is bankrupt and whose privilege is paid for by those who don’t have it.

Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness. Copyright © 2021 The Center for American Greatness.

The Quantum Financial System

We will see what happens????

QFS Destroys Central Banking System

QFS has no equivalent in advanced technology

Global Currency Reset

Donald Trump re-elected as first President of the new Republic of America

Unity makes power

 

The Quantum Financial System QFS

Little is it known that this new system has been designed in preparation for the takeover of the Central Bank Monetary Debt System to end the financial slavery and control over the populace. The Alliance gave President Trump the magic wand of taking over the old banking system without changing it.

Humanity does not have the technology to fight the Deep State’s financial system. Extraterrestrials came to the rescue with alien or even other-dimensional technologies to accomplish this task. In Quantum Computers, intelligence is embedded without 3D proprieties. No 3D creation is able to replace the power of a living being. To this end, artificial intelligence (AI) was designed to replace conscious beings.

A spiritual entity was set up to fulfill physical realization for all beings above the fourth dimension. Our earth is like a living being that obtains its life force from the planetary symbol ring. The QFS is expected to operate on Quantum Benevolent Intelligence with interaction on any financial transaction anywhere in the financial world. As a guarantee that every transaction; is legal and transparent for every account holder. Someone who has mastered quantum physics can understand the effect this quantum information technology has on every financial transaction that passes through the quantum financial system. – It cannot be modified. The confirmation and disclosure of this fortunate component of the QFS is the assurance and hallmark of a one hundred percent reliable, neutral and secure transfer system.

Some people try to discredit the QFS which is the greatest financial advancement of all time. This misunderstanding may be a result of the fact that the QFS has no comparison to anything that has ever been presented to the world before. It is like an antigravity machine compared to an automobile. There is no real basis to understand this technology. It has no peer; it has no equivalent in advanced technology that anyone has had before. It is new. It reigns supreme in the technology it uses to accomplish the financial security and transparency needed for currency holders to perform all financial humanitarian objectives. With the QFS, the world can be flooded with gold-backed currencies that are designed to eliminate the old Cabal financial system with central banksters in control over all financial transactions.

QFS Destroys Central Banking System

With the activation of the QFS, the Alliance will have completely destroyed the Rothschild Central Banking system that has been designed by Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1744 – 1812) to control the world economy and put the world population into debt slavery.

Truth is, the QFS has been running in parallel with the Central Banking System for some time and has countered many hacking attempts by the Cabal to steal funds. In the process, many banksters have been caught red handed and arrested. This powerful quantum computer system could assign a digital number to every fiat dollar/euro/Yen sitting in every bank account all over the world and consequently monitor in real-time money streams; knowing exactly where particular monies went when it was transferred, who sent it by their login info, and which account received the money.

Imagine the frustration of a banker who has just stolen some money and this illegally transferred to another account and subsequently being arrested in real time for theft. These poor bankster devils, have been defeated. They are taking their last gasp of air before the weight of their ‘death plans’ comes crashing down on their pathetic, baby-blood-sucking, bodies.

 

Only gold-backed currencies that have a digital gold certificate can be transferred through the QFS. The gold certificate references a serial number on a piece of gold held in reserve to back the currency. Off-world technologies are used to quarantine the gold used to back the currencies. There is no way it can be stolen or taken out of the secure vaults where they are stored. That is why it is called gold-backed currency, it has to refer back to the piece of gold in the vault that is backing it.

References to ‘asset-backed currencies’ is the process of establishing a currency based on assets within the country of origin. Assets are the justification to establish the amount of currency available in a country, but all denominations of currencies must be resided within the QFS and been given a gold certificate to be active within the QFS. If the assets are mined or extracted from the earth, they will be sold on the marketplace as with any other commodity. This is an enormous process, an assignment of no small feat to accomplish. But, a required process to ensure worldwide value to all currencies used within the QFS.

Any Fiat currency that cannot be regarded clean, clear, non-terroristic and not established to support illegal activities, that disqualifies most Fiat currencies, cannot become a legal currency in the QFS. – Fiat currencies received from legal activities will be exchanged for gold-backed currencies at the bank.

 QFS has no equivalent in advanced technology

The Quantum Financial System – QFS has no comparison to anything that has ever been introduced to the world before. It has no peer; it has no equivalent in advanced technology of any other system before it. It is brand new. It reigns supreme in the technology it applies, in order to accomplish the one hundred percent financial security and transparency all currency account holders require. With the QFS, the monetary system of the world can easily be changed to encompass gold-backed currencies that completely eliminate the use of the old Cabal central banking system. Regrettably, to fully comprehend the advanced QFS-structure, there doesn’t exist an equivalent technology to serve as an example.

Global Currency Reset

Without the ability to certify existing money into the new QFS, all Central Bank activities will cease to have any relevance within this new financial system. A country that is not GESARA compliant will be left out of the QFS and eventually will be left out of the international trade. Their oil or grains, or whatever, are still valuable but how is a GESARA compliant nation going to pay for commodities to a non-participant in the QFS?

The money cannot be transferred. Non-compliant countries, if any, will be left to barter commodities or work out a credit exchange with other countries, a system that is not presently available to do business at any level of relevancy. Talking about third world countries – non-compliant countries will be relegated to fourth or fifth world countries.

Each country must be GESARA compliant to participate in the QFS. The Alliance will use a specific quantitative formula to establish the amount of currency available, “in a country,” which is to be gold-backed in the QFS. The results of the formula will establish a fair value of each country’s assets as compared to one and another. There is far more gold than needed to accomplish the gold-backing of all world currencies. Once established through the GCR, the price of gold will become irrelevant for the value of a specific currency against each other. All monies are equally calibrated.

 If the price of gold goes up, the value of all currencies will go up as well, resulting in no net change to the par value of all currencies. The formula includes, in ground assets, the economy of the country, its awake population – which is one of the country’s assets, and a number of other parameters to determine the value of the country’s currency. This formula is to be applied to each country so that all currencies will be on par value with all other countries.

The application of the formula and the common value of all gold, means that one country’s currency has to have the same value as another country’s currency. This is called the Global Currency Reset – the reset of all currencies on par with all other world currencies and each one has a gold certificate to validate authenticity. It’s a requirement of each country to use the reset formula and apply the worldwide standard, to assure the QFS to function as planned. That is the reason why a country must be GESARA compliant to participate in the QFS.

Donald Trump re-elected as first President of the new Republic of America

The Alliance has confirmed that their goal of defeating the Deep State has been far more complex, time-consuming and difficult than had been anticipated and planned for. It is becoming increasingly obvious that world-changing information is about to be made public, probably sooner than expected. This is likely to be accompanied by the much-anticipated mass arrests. There are literally over one hundred seventy thousand sealed criminal indictments ready to be executed, and partly already have been executed. Once Donald Trump is re-elected as the first President of the new Republic of America in this coming November, this sequence of events will take place, it will be up to the awakened readers to help everyone to understand what is going on, explaining the positive nature of the changes that already are occurring and those that are underway.

Never forget; the deliberate debasement of our fiat currency by central bankers is theft and is the current monies are counterfeited. The Founding Fathers of the United States of America saw counterfeiting as a serious crime, deserving the death penalty.

The Deep State elites are in a panic, as more people are awakening and they realize they cannot stop it. They are continually trying with COVID, face masks, social distancing, riots, etc. to prevent or suppress this process, but the truth is coming out and cannot be stopped anymore.

 Now, it is time people learn to think for themselves, by becoming detached from hypes, in which for example multitudes of people, due to a mindless kind of group-think, come to the conclusion that something like fiat paper money is valuable, whereas if they were to think logically, they would come to the conclusion that this is not the case. Much in the world has been intentionally misinterpreted and misrepresented by the media. For example, the idea of Democracy is good and Anarchy is bad, which in fact is exactly the opposite. There is a great lack of independent, critically thinking people. This lack can easily be lifted by reading and studying my book THE GREAT AWAKENING, part 1 and part 2, and consequently experiencing and consciously understanding the upcoming developments with joy.

 To defeat the Deep State for once and forever; it is necessary that at least 50% of the populace is awake. If, just each one of the awake, wake up two more people and if those on their turn awake 2 other people, is in just 54 rounds the whole world populace awakes. It is very important for all of us that as many people as possible wake up and stay awake. Informing people in their native or familiar language is essential in achieving this goal; the goal of ultimately liberating humanity.

 Unity makes power

Awake people want to meet other awake individuals, without masks, for the reason, we together are stronger, and abler to defeat the Deep State cabal quicker. Our liberation process cannot be stopped anymore. Uniting with others who are like-minded people creates and shapes our best reality. Worldwide awake networks are created, like in the Marbella / Malaga area who have been around for several months with increasing numbers of participants. If you would like to meet up with them

The Grand Illusion

The Grand Illusion

Monday, February 08, 2021

THE SITUATION

The federal government is illegitimate. I can unwind that all you want, but it’s a fact. It’s a fact to such an extent that they have put up a twelve-foot-high fence around the capitol with razor wire crowning the structure. They’ve posted twenty-thousand troops near at hand in case too many of us figure it out. They are afraid of us and they should be. If I had defied the will of the people and installed a mentally deficient old man instead of the people’s choice, I’d be worried about the anger of the American people, too.

This country is coasting on an illusion. There is no federal government, or state governments at this stage, except for the original thirteen, who were not created by the Constitution. The states might maintain their borders and government to the degree that the people of that state agree to play nice. All federal laws, however, are moot. Most state laws that were required to replicate the federal laws likewise are moot, except to the extent that those state governments agree to maintain them.

This is all very simple. There was election fraud. The discussion is over. Between Mike Lindell’s documentary, released videos of illegal activity, thousands upon thousands of eyewitness testimony backed up by affidavits to that effect, the 22 court cases where Trump prevailed and the Time Magazine article that admitted how it was done, at least on the public perception and media manipulation side of the ledger. The science is SETTLED on election fraud.

They don’t want you to talk about election fraud, because that is the one topic that most can agree on and it is the one that literally pulls the nation apart. Most people haven’t done the deep dive, yet. They know there was fraud and expected the government officials to live up to their oaths and do their duty, but they all abdicated. Why? Because they all know instinctively that to recognize it is to dissolve the government.

All of those sitting in congress right now know the gig is up. They remain because if they can stay there long enough, project authority without having it, they can obtain it just the same. This is why they all talk about preserving “democracy” by taking their position. It is their justification for keeping everyone quiet about what we all saw take place. The question is: whose “democracy?” Certainly, not the people’s republic.

It’s why they feel completely free to violate every tenet of the Constitution, because if the election was fraudulent, they know they have conquered the republic and operate now as a democracy where cheating the vote is honored. The power brokers are those who can deliver the most ballots, not the most votes. It’s a much simpler political climate for them, but it absolutely destroys the power of the people. They don’t even need to raise more money to get their message out to more voters, all they have to do is hire more “vote harvesters.”

I am hoping to convince you to keep the pressure up on the stolen election. Refuse to be bullied into denouncing it. Right now, it’s your only shot at surviving the next year. They are coming for you (HR 1). They are coming for your guns (HR127). They are coming for your children. These pedophiles are insatiable.

THE AUTONOMOUS COUNTY PROJECT

Since introducing the Autonomous County Project a few weeks ago, I held a seminar, played Lies of Omission and had a discussion about establishing an autonomous county. County commissioners have reviewed the film and introduced language to establish a Second Amendment sanctuary in at least one county. Not as a result exactly, but it played a part in their decision. Okay, not enough for me. All it takes at that point is a Supreme Court decision and their Second Amendment sanctuary is no more, but it’s a start.

Stop thinking about the Supreme Court, it is just as corrupt as any other federal agency. None of them are legitimate, because the Constitution is null and void. The people running this government under its condition of invalidity only need your silence to snuff you out. That’s all they need. The whole functioning of the federal government right now is a ruse. It is a bluff that you have to call.

Here’s how it works: the United States Government, like ALL governments, operates with the consent of the governed. Even in the greatest of tyrannies, it is the silence of the people that allows them to stay in power. So, tyrannies maintain that silence at all costs. If the people of the United States had wanted to disband the government a long time ago, they could have done it and still can. It just takes a lot of people and a lot of noise to accomplish it. This is what they know.

THE PANDEMIC

The pandemic had to do with getting Trump out of office. But, that was not its primary purpose. The primary purpose was to see if the people could be bullied into conceding to authority that was obviously and intentionally unconstitutional. The purpose of that was to see if they could cheat as much as they had to steal the election. It was to see if the American people could be ruled after they had been denied their choice for president. They let the corruption of the Supreme Court be televised to rise above even that limitation. The Supreme Court responded favorably (probably as a deal with the senate) to forestall packing the court. It was so the usurpers and conspirators could then pursue the radical leftist agenda with only the force of 20,000 National Guard troops.

THE CHALLENGE

They won. At least in the early stages. But, all of this hinges on your silence, your acquiescence. I suggest putting pressure on your county and your state to rebel. Many of the people at the state level don’t play by the federal rules and have respect for the Constitution. In a lot of cases they can be counted on to rule on the law, not their sentiments.

It all hinges on the illusion and that illusion can be broken in ANY state court that challenges the authority of the federal government to act now that it is in violation of the Constitution. It can rule to ignore executive orders or any other federal law. They can require the congress to prove their authority by establishing that the federal election was conducted under the Constitution and the constitutions of the six states in question (though I would go further and demand proof that ALL states had conducted their elections under their constitutions because that could affect the balance in the House and Senate). If it cannot prove the election was appropriately and legally accomplished, (which they can’t), the assumption is that it was NOT and the congress has no authority to pass laws and Joe Biden lacks the authority to sign them.

If the election was held improperly, the government that relies on the consent of the governed to convey authority to its institutions through free and fair elections is lost. Including the Supreme Court. They, not the courts and not the people, put the whole system in jeopardy.

They are already trying to use the legal sleight of hand. The Supreme Court will rule on court cases concerning the election and it will rule against Trump and declare the election valid. It does not change the truth, but they will try it. They might even rule in Trump’s favor on one or two that they can afford to lose, if they maintain that it would not have changed the outcome. It’s still all a ruse to get you to shut up. That’s all they want. That’s all they need.

DEMAND A REMEDY

The remedy for this situation would be one of several possibilities: 1) a revote; 2) an honest (and that’s a big word in this discussion) tabulation that accounts for every ballot and for any that had not been maintained, requires a revote in that precinct up to and including a statewide revote; 3) a moratorium on new laws until a new election can be held; 4) secession and reorganization under the existing Constitution with a chance to further amend it to eliminate the possibility of future vote fraud; 5) secession with each state sending a delegation to create a new constitution; 6) secession and free-for-all.

The federal government can forestall all of it by coming clean and holding a new election properly, letting the chips fall where they.

What they cannot be allowed to do, if you value freedom of ANY sort, is to maintain this illusion of authority.

I cannot say this clearly enough. All it takes is your VOICE. Battle back against the narrative that this election was held properly and the outcome was just. Destroy that and you destroy their efforts even this late in the game. Challenge them in court. It doesn’t matter the outcome. Raise the authority of the federal government that is operating against the will of the people as expressed by the legal and righteous votes cast, but not counted.

People, you are living the life of a slave and if it doesn’t feel that way yet, wait. You have the power to break free, just use it.

Stand Up America Newsletter Sign Up

Join our email list

Select list(s) to subscribe to

Please support our non-profit work at SUA

  • JOIN/SUBSCRIBE: Please join our team and receive periodic newsletters and announcements securely. (Your information will never be sold or transferred – Opt-out anytime.)
  • VOLUNTEER: If you are unable to donate your money, your time is just as valuable.
  • DONATIONS: Please consider a recurring monthly or a one-time donation.

Stand Up America US Foundation

If you wish to donate to our fund by sending a check, please mail your donation to:

S.U.A.
Stand Up America US Foundation
PO Box 1596
Bigfork, MT 59911

Thank you for Supporting Our Troops — God Bless.

To donate online with PayPal, please click the button below. We are a 501 C (4) not for profit, non partisan organization.

Red Nation Rising

Archives