T2SDA is coming – Is Obama Planning to shut it down?

UPDATE – 6:45 PM Eastern – SUA has tried all day to get confirmation or denial of the possible steps the administration may take in regard to a possible shutdown of the DC Beltway without success. We called numerous agencies at the federal, state and local levels with little to report. However the question Red State and others asked has still not been answered but the “truckers” involved tell us it is not so, they do not think there is any truth to the use of National Guardsman to close I-495 tomorrow.

Editor’s Note – Stand Up America, like a great deal of other Americans, we want to know if there are actual legal grounds for shutting down federal property because of a so-called government shutdown. Well truckers certainly want to shutdown Washington, D.C. starting tomorrow and flowing through Saturday and Sunday. They also want certain politicians and administrators arrested. See their web site here, and also their Facebook page here.

When there are open air facilities like the WWII Memorial and the Vietnam Veterans Wall that require little to no expense to be allowed to remain open, and therefore costs more to close them, how are these acts part of the federal budget shutdown? The shutdown is the stoppage of the expenditure of funds, but the Obama Administration is actually increasing the cost.

They even coned off the highway so no one could stop to view Mt. Rushmore.
They even coned off the highway so no one could stop to view Mt. Rushmore.

We have seen the Obama Administration try to shut down even non-federal properties (Barrycades) like Mt. Vernon to make their political points but can they legally shutdown something like an interstate highway to thwart a demonstration by law-abiding citizens who intend to use the freeway in a lawful manner? Heck, they even coned off the roadway to prevent drivers from stopping to view Mt. Rushmore.

If that is the case, why are any interstate highways allowed to remain open? This is the most twisted form of logic, something that is clearly a political statement, a threat, an attempt to do harm to the people by its own government.

The people own the federal properties, not the person in charge of administering them. A shutdown means they stop administering, not using them as political cudgels. Now we have the makings of a real mess as truckers across the land converge on Washington, D.C. to make a political statement which is the purview solely of the people, not the people they hire to run the government who maybe planning to shut it down entirely and administer the shutdown with National Guardsmen.

The “Truckers to Shut Down America” (T2SDA) is clearly an example of the people redressing grievances to the government, but Obama is reportedly set to shut them down from using an open interstate freeway. The shutdown is the excuse, but if they said it was for public safety we could understand, but neither is a reason to stop a demonstration comprised of drivers using a freeway legally.

State officials are gearing up as well; this should be very interesting and possibly the largest demonstration of complete dissatisfaction with those who are running the government ever. The White House may actually be making things worse, possibly fomenting confrontations. Is this the type of leadership Americans call tyranny, clearly it is on display once again?

Patriotic Americans want to shutdown the tyranny, but it may be the government itself shutting down the highway instead. They really did not like the bikers converging on DC, but they opened a park for a demonstration by illegal aliens?

Obama DOT Plans use of National Guard to close I-495 Capital Beltway tomorrow?

By: Glenn Ryt – Red State

Sources within the Department of Transportation have revealed that their plan to use National Guard resources to close federally funded Interstate Route 495, circling the nation’s capital, have been approved by unknown White House officials and will be implemented on Friday morning, October 11, in order to thwart the three day Trucker slowdown announced on the Capitol Beltway starting that date, using the federal government shutdown as justification.

The National Guard resources to be used to thwart the truckers will include rifle toting National Guardsmen called up from units that will be coming in from Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia.  They will use Guardsmen on foot and using trucks, jeeps and armored vehicles, which will be stationed at all entrance ramps to the Beltway to block incoming traffic starting early Friday morning.


Calls to both the White House and the Department of Transportation to confirm this story were not answered at press time.  Unless an announcement is made in advance, it appears the first notice of this new White House plan to punish House GOP members who have cited their Constitutional authority to approve – or not approve – all spending proposed by the White House and their Democratic allies in the Senate, will be early Friday morning.

Our DOT sources point to their Department’s website as justification for the paucity of information and our inability to confirm this story in advance, where they state, “during the government shutdown, some online content may not be updated on a regular basis…”

These sources at the Department of Transportation have advised off the record that the DOT proposal included the confident belief that the Capitol Beltway shutdown will successfully achieve the twin goals of thrwarting the trucker protest scheduled for a three day period starting on Friday, as well as deal another punishing blow to what they call “the crazy wing of the GOP” which refuses to capitulate to their demands to approve a budget that includes Obamacare funding.

Protesting “the corruption that is destroying America,” the “Truckers Ride for the Constitution” aims to tie up two of the three lanes of Interstate 495 circling the nation’s capital, with big rigs traveling no faster than the legal limit in two of the three lanes, an organizer told U.S. News & World Report.  Fox TV news reported that they expect 10,000 or more truckers to continuously circle the beltway for the three day weekend, effectively shutting it down except for the third, passing lane they will allow for emergency vehicles.

The truckers hoped to enlist sympathetic motorists and will allow them to pass their slowed trucks if they display a sign on their car with the letters T2SDA which means “Truckers to Shut Down America,” their original name.  Other sources connected to the truckers state that they will do nothing illegal, but had planned only to drive at the minimum legal speed limit, which would in fact tie up traffic around the busy interstate.

“Since Interstate 495 is clearly a federal roadway,” report our DOT sources, and “the federal government is now closed because of the crazy House of Representatives Republicans, it is within the purview of the federal government to add it to the list of government properties that are closed and may not be used by citizens.”

While the planned 495 roadway shutdown by National Guardsmen this Friday is presently planned to coincide with the three day truckers protest, another DOT proposal suggests that the White House has the authority to extend the highway shutdown past the proposed three day closure, and to other federally funded Interstate Highways, such as I-95 and I-66 in Northern Virginia.

Officials of the Freedom Leadership Conference, a gathering of conservatives in Northern Virginia, announced that they will schedule a speaker to lead a protest if these plans are carried through on Friday morning, at their scheduled function on Thursday, October 17 at the Fairfax, Marriott at Fair Oaks Shopping Mall at 7 PM.

The Conference this month is sponsored by the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, whose President, Michael Thompson, will be the keynote speaker to address the Institute’s proposals for tax reform in Virginia to boost business and bring 80,000 new jobs to the Commonwealth.  An example of a tax that inhibits the growth of business is the very unpopular “gross receipts tax” which Thompson will propose abolishing.

Capital_Beltway_Map_Color.svgThe second principal speaker at the conference one week from today is Michael O’Neill, the assistant general counsel of Mark Levin’s Landmark Legal Foundation, who will address Levin’s proposed “Liberty Amendments” detailed in the new bestselling book by the same name.

The Thursday evening, October 17 event is being billed as a “Conservative Change Conference.”

Ironically, the purpose of the Liberty Amendments to the Constitution is to constrain growing federal government power at the expense of the authority of the states and the freedom of the citizens, not the intent of the founding fathers, say supporters of the proposal.  In that sense, the “change” the conference organizers speak of is actually a simple return to the original intent of America’s founding fathers.

Freedom Leadership Conference officials now state they will add a third speaker on the subject of what they call the President’s unauthorized power grabs during the supposed government “shutdown” during which nearly 85% of the federal government remains open and functioning, despite closing of the open air Monuments in Washington, DC, and other open air government grounds such as Gettysburg battlefield and historic Valley Forge, PA and other locations.

The Freedom Leadership Conference functions have been reserved for members only since they changed to a monthly function in late 2012, having started as an annual function fourteen years ago.  Sponsored by a different conservative organization each month, there have now been over 60 sponsor organizations in the past 14 years.  Admission now is open to anyone interested, although only those who advance register will be admitted.  Those interested in attending the free October 17 conference may reserve their tickets to the conference, which begins with a coffee, tea and dessert social at 7 PM, via the internet, HERE.

Previous stories about plans for the October 17 conference are headlined Mike O’Neill to speak on “The Liberty Amendments” Proposal of Mark Levin at October 17 Conference and the earlier article, Conservative Change Conference set for October 17, 2013: Michael Thompson to speak at Freedom Leadership Conference on new tax proposal for Virginia.

The Wednesday, November 13 Freedom Leadership Conference will be sponsored by Uniformed Services League, featuring a “Salute to Our Servicemen” (SOS) rally with keynote speaker, U.S. Congressman Scott Perry (R-PA), who is also a Colonel in the U.S. Army National Guard who has already served in Iraq.   The November conference will also be an “open” conference (new attendees welcome) and also at the Fairfax Marriott at Fair Oaks Mall.



Here is their the press release:


Thomas Sowell – Who Shut Down the Government?

Editor’s Note – If we strip away all the rhetoric, all the spin, all the posturing, what is happening concerning the so-called government shutdown and the impending Debt Ceiling argument is very simple really. Thomas Sowell, in his own inimitable way, cuts through all the bull shit. Yes, we said bull shit since decorum on Capital Hill and in the White House is gone.

With all the name-calling, the excoriation of vast swath of the citizenry called the Tea Party, the demonization of a true patriot in the person of Senator Cruz, to the internecine bickering and the ‘eating of their young’ in the Republican Party, it all boils down to childish and narcissistic behavior.business woman with palm up

But then again, it took a set of childish bullying and bribery to pass Obama Care in the first place back in March of 2010, and then there is the complete reversal of rhetoric by Obama on the debt ceiling. Jonah Goldberg is a lot nicer about then we are, but here he claims that Obama is a vindictive man, add Reid to that line as well:

Shutting down the government in an effort to use a budget fight to get rid of Obamacare is not the strategy I would have recommended for the GOP. And while Republicans can be blamed for starting the shutdown, it’s increasingly apparent that President Obama and the Democrats deserve the lion’s share of blame for not only prolonging it but also making it as painful as possible.

Obama has always had a bit of a vindictive streak when it comes to politics. I think it stems from his Manichaean view of America. There are the reasonable people — who agree with him. And there are the bitter clingers who disagree for irrational or extremist ideological reasons. (Read the rest here.)

Somehow it works, why? Because so many people cannot keep up, are purposely set into confusion, and then there is the reliance on the cult of personality. Frankly, Sen. Cruz and his allies appear to be the only adults in the room. Perhaps the most childish act was shutting down an open air memorial, the WWII Memorial, like the White House tours were stopped when sequestration took place.

How does America not see this infantile obdurance and fatuous narcissism in the form of Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi? But who are these non-essential government workers furloughed? Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) seems to have the best answer, Obama is non-essential:

“What do we need him for? I think he’s nonessential personnel myself because if he won’t negotiate, what do we need him for? He wants to golf, let’s be honest”, the California Republican told a gaggle of reporters.

Who Shut Down the Government?

By Thomas Sowell – Townhall

Even when it comes to something as basic, and apparently as simple and straightforward, as the question of who shut down the federal government, there are diametrically opposite answers, depending on whether you talk to Democrats or to Republicans.

There is really nothing complicated about the facts. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives voted all the money required to keep all government activities going — except for ObamaCare.

This is not a matter of opinion. You can check the Congressional Record.

As for the House of Representatives’ right to grant or withhold money, that is not a matter of opinion either. You can check the Constitution of the United States. All spending bills must originate in the House of Representatives, which means that Congressmen there have a right to decide whether or not they want to spend money on a particular government activity.


Whether ObamaCare is good, bad or indifferent is a matter of opinion. But it is a matter of fact that members of the House of Representatives have a right to make spending decisions based on their opinion.

ObamaCare is indeed “the law of the land,” as its supporters keep saying, and the Supreme Court has upheld its Constitutionality.

But the whole point of having a division of powers within the federal government is that each branch can decide independently what it wants to do or not do, regardless of what the other branches do, when exercising the powers specifically granted to that branch by the Constitution.
The hundreds of thousands of government workers who have been laid off are not idle because the House of Representatives did not vote enough money to pay their salaries or the other expenses of their agencies — unless they are in an agency that would administer ObamaCare.

Since we cannot read minds, we cannot say who — if anybody — “wants to shut down the government.” But we do know who had the option to keep the government running and chose not to. The money voted by the House of Representatives covered everything that the government does, except for ObamaCare.

The Senate chose not to vote to authorize that money to be spent, because it did not include money for ObamaCare. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says that he wants a “clean” bill from the House of Representatives, and some in the media keep repeating the word “clean” like a mantra. But what is unclean about not giving Harry Reid everything he wants?

If Senator Reid and President Obama refuse to accept the money required to run the government, because it leaves out the money they want to run ObamaCare, that is their right. But that is also their responsibility.

You cannot blame other people for not giving you everything you want. And it is a fraud to blame them when you refuse to use the money they did vote, even when it is ample to pay for everything else in the government.

stick tongue out

When Barack Obama keeps claiming that it is some new outrage for those who control the money to try to change government policy by granting or withholding money, that is simply a bald-faced lie. You can check the history of other examples of “legislation by appropriation” as it used to be called.

Whether legislation by appropriation is a good idea or a bad idea is a matter of opinion. But whether it is both legal and not unprecedented is a matter of fact.

Perhaps the biggest of the big lies is that the government will not be able to pay what it owes on the national debt, creating a danger of default. Tax money keeps coming into the Treasury during the shutdown, and it vastly exceeds the interest that has to be paid on the national debt.

Even if the debt ceiling is not lifted, that only means that government is not allowed to run up new debt. But that does not mean that it is unable to pay the interest on existing debt.

None of this is rocket science. But unless the Republicans get their side of the story out — and articulation has never been their strong suit — the lies will win. More important, the whole country will lose.